Both ENDS - Information Fact Sheet D
Planning,
Monitoring and Evaluation |
Both ENDS offers a wide range of services to NGOs in Africa, Latin America, Asia and Central and Eastern Europe, who are working in the field
of environment, development and social justice.
Our standard information service includes Information Packages on a wide range of topical environment issues. We also produce Information
Fact Sheets on a number of environmental topics and on issues of capacity building. The aim of these fact sheets is to provide brief overviews
and contacts on the mentioned subjects. This is ideal for NGOs who want a short guide on a particular issue.
Contents:
a
brief overview of the theme
a
listing of useful contacts
a
list of publications
a list of websites
We make an effort to update the information included in these packages and fact sheets. However, since people and developments move fast,
we inevitably lag behind somewhat.
The information presented is meant as an introduction. If you require more specific information, please feel free to contact us.
You can download the information packages and facts sheets from our Website or you can request an e-mail printed version. They are free
of charge to NGOs in the South and Central/Eastern Europe.
We welcome any suggestions or comments which will help us improve these information packages.
Both ENDS Environmental and Development Service for NGOs
Nieuwe Keizersgracht 45 1018 VC Amsterdam the Netherlands Phone: +31-20-6230823 Fax: +31-20-6208049 E-mail: info@bothends.org Website: http://www.bothends.org
This activity has been made possible thanks to the financial support of the Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment (VROM).
Planning,
Monitoring and Evaluation |
1. Introduction
A
system for planning, monitoring and evaluation (or, in short, ‘PME’) can
help an organization to manage a project. It helps to
gauge how well the organization is implementing its activities, to take
stock of progress made, and to identify the lessons to be learned. Planning,
monitoring and evaluation are three activities that are closely related to each
other.
During
planning, needs are identified and objectives (the broader goals that you want
to reach) are determined. During the identification, specific attention should
be given to gender and class differences. It is decided through which activities
the objectives will be reached, and which resources are needed. The necessary
roles, responsibilities and requirements are established. During planning it is
already pointed out how progress will be measured and when monitoring and
evaluation will take place.
Monitoring
takes place during the implementation of project activities. It helps one to
observe progress, to take account of unexpected consequences of activities, and
to adapt to changing circumstances. In short, monitoring investigates whether
the reality turns out as expected during planning. Furthermore, during
monitoring attention is often given to the cooperation between the different
parties, and their motivation for working on the project. Monitoring also
includes keeping a check on the use of resources.
In
general, evaluation takes place after activities have come to an end. Evaluation
is meant to observe to what extent planned activities have been realized and
planned objectives and impact have been reached. Often, during evaluation the
not anticipated consequences of a project are also observed. Further,
evaluations often look at the relevance, efficiency (the costs of realising
particular results), effectiveness (the extent to which particular activities
have reached their objective), impact, and sustainability of a project. Finally,
in an evaluation attention is given to the lessons learned and how these lessons
can be integrated in future projects.
Often, evaluation is seen as something done by outsiders, at the finalization of a project. However, there exists also auto-evaluation, which is done by the organization responsible for the project itself. A system for PME becomes participatory where beneficiaries actively contribute to the design, carry out monitoring activities, and are involved in the final judgement, or evaluation, of project activities.
Building a house: an example of
Planning, Monitoring and Evaluating In
fact, everyone has experience with PME in daily life. For example, no one
starts building a house from scratch. Before you start, you make a plan
and ask yourself a lot of questions: Where am I going to build my house?
What should it look like? What kind of materials do I need? How much money
is available? When should we do what kind of activity? Planning is
necessary to work organized and get better results. Nonetheless,
during the realization of your plan, a lot of things can go differently
than expected. For example, the stones from which you wanted to build your
house are not available any more. Or your friend, the carpenter,
encountered other work. Or the prices of certain materials have risen. At
these times, you have to adapt your original plan. You have to watch
carefully the state of actual affairs and compare it with your original
expectations. This is monitoring: continuously observing the situation and
making the necessary corrections to reach your objective. And
what happens when your house is finalized? It could be you are very happy
about the result. But, more probably, you are not happy about everything.
The costs were too high, or the location of the kitchen is not very
practical. After finishing, you do an evaluation of your work, and you
might think: “The costs were too high, next time I will use cheaper
materials”, or “It took
too much time; next time I will hire more bricklayers to speed up
construction”. Hence, your evaluation results in lessons for the future. |
There
are several reasons to do PME. Many organizations regard PME as a cumbersome
obligation imposed by donors. PME does provide organizational transparency, and
accountability to donors. It gives donors the idea that their money has been
spent effectively and has had sustainable results. However, accountability to
donors is really a secondary objective of a PME process. In the first place, a
good system of PME helps an organization to reflect on its own activities, to
learn from mistakes, and to empower itself for future activities. Moreover, PME
provides transparency and accountability to local stakeholders and
beneficiaries.
In that way, a PME system can be a means for becoming a ‘learning organization’. During planning, on the basis of an analysis of the problem situation an organization will figure out a strategy to bring change. During monitoring and evaluation, this strategy is validated. It is observed in how far the expected changes indeed take place, and if not, why not. For example, it may be that the initial analysis was incorrect. In the follow up of the project or in future planning, one can take into account the experiences with earlier strategies.
Many organizations use the Logical Framework (‘Logframe’) as their main tool for PME. A Logframe is a simplified representation of a project in the form of a matrix. During the planning of a project, the Logframe helps to think through the structure of the project, and to ensure that the activities and outcomes of a project are directly related to its objectives. Already at the moment of planning, indicators and ways to verify the results are identified that will facilitate monitoring and evaluation later on. The Logframe further includes the assumptions or hypotheses underlying the proposed activities, which can also be verified during implementation and after the completion of the project, to facilitate learning.
The Logframe should be seen as a flexible tool, which should be adapted to the specific context of the project, and not as a mechanical procedure to satisfy donors. Apart from the advantages, there are also some disadvantages to the Logframe. Though experienced users may find the Logframe very helpful, for inexperienced users the procedure may be confusing and complicated. Too strict adherence to the Logframe results in inflexibility and the impossibility to adapt to changes during implementation. Finally, while using the Logframe, one may easily overlook possible side-effects of a project, such as gender implications or the effects on the environment.
An example of a Logframe and the questions to ask yourself while constructing it
Project
Structure |
Indicators
of achievement and value (or
‘measurable indicators’) |
How
indicators can be quantified or assessed (or
‘means of verification’) |
Important
assumptions, risks and conditions |
Goal
What
are the wider problems that the project will help to resolve? |
What
are the quantitative ways of measuring or the qualitative ways of judging
whether the goal is realised? |
What
sources of information exist or can be provided cost-effectively? |
|
Objectives
What
are the intended short-term effects on the target group? What
are the expected benefits (or negative effects) and to whom will they go? What
changes will the project bring about? |
What
are the quantitative measures or qualitative evidence by which achievement
and distribution of effects and benefits can be judged? |
What
sources of information exist or can be provided cost-effectively? Does
provision for collection needs to be made under Inputs and Outputs? |
What conditions,
outside the control of the implementing organization, are necessary if the
achievements of the projects Objectives is to contribute to the
realisation of the projects overall goal |
Outputs
What
outputs (kind, quantity, and by when) are to be produced by the project in
order to achieve the Objectives? |
What
are the sources of information? |
What external factors
must be present for the outputs to be likely to lead to achievement of the
Objectives? |
|
Activities
What
activities must be carried out to produce these outputs? |
Summary of key inputs,
with costs
What
materials, equipment, etc. are to be provided, at what costs, and over
what period by the implementing organization, other NGOs, donors or
beneficiaries? |
What external factors
must be present if implementation of the Activities is to produce the
planned Outputs on schedule? |
Source: ICCO, 2000. Building bridges in PME. ICCO, the Netherlands
Not
every PME system will be satisfactory for every organization. It is important
that a PME system is tailor made: that it suits the mission, vision and
strategies of an organization, and is relevant for the stakeholders. PME systems
should be flexible: when they turn out not to provide the necessary information
it should be possible to change them. Furthermore, they need to be transparent
for both the users and other stakeholders of a project. A PME system should be
simple, to ensure that its users are motivated to use it, and that it enables
accountability. Most important is that a PME system only takes account of the
information necessary to measure the result, it is not meant to create
‘cemeteries of data’.
Over
the last ten years, a lot of information has become available on PME systems and
on Logical Frameworks. In the following chapter, a selection of concrete methods
on ‘how to do it’ is given. These can help you to identify what kind of PME
system is relevant for your situation and the tools that can be used for doing
the planning, monitoring and evaluation.
5.
List of useful PME manuals
APC
WNSP. Gender Evaluation Methodology (GEM): a guide to integrating a gender
analysis into evaluations of initiatives that use Information and Communication
Technologies (ICTs) for social change.
Language: English/Spanish. Gender Evaluation
Methodology available on the Internet: http://www.apcwomen.org/gem/gend_indicators.htm
The
Association for Progressive Communications Women's Networking Support Programme
(APC WNSP) is an international network of individual women and women's
organizations promoting gender equality in the design, implementation, access
and use of information and communications technology and in the policy decisions
and frameworks that regulate them. They are experimenting with GEM all over the
world.
McAllister,
K. and R. Vernooy, 1999. Action and
reflection: a guide for monitoring and evaluating participatory research.
IDRC, Canada
Language: English. Available on the Internet:
http://web.idrc.ca/ev.php?ID=27729_201&ID2=DO_TOPIC
International
Development Research Centre (IDRC). is a public corporation to help developing
countries use science and technology to find practical, long-term solutions to
the social, economic, and environmental problems they face. Support is directed
toward developing an indigenous research capacity. The guide outlines an
approach for monitoring and evaluating participatory research and development
projects at the community level, dealing with natural resource management
issues.
Auble,
J., 1990. Participatory Program Evaluation Manual, Involving program stakeholders
in the evaluation process. 2nd edition, Child Survival Technical
Support project and Catholic Relief Services, USA
Language:
English/French/Spanish. The English manual can be found on the web:
http://web.idrc.ca/uploads/user-S/10504133390Participatory_Program_Evaluation_Manual.pdf
Child
Survival Technical Support project (CSTS), is funded by the office of Private
and Voluntary Cooperation, Bureau of Humanitarian Response, of USAID, and
managed by ORC Macro. CSTS basic concern is reducing children’s illnesses and
death through preventive health care programs aimed at infants, children, and
mothers in the developing world. Technical support is given to increase their
capacity to achieve sustainable service delivery in public health interventions.
AusAID,
2003. The Logical Framework Approach. AusGUIDE, Commonwealth of Australia
2000, Australia.
Language: English. Available on the Internet:
http://www.ausaid.gov.au/ausguide/ausguidelines/1.cfm
The
Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID), manages the Australian
Government's official overseas aid program. Their objective is to advance
Australia's national interest by helping developing countries reduce poverty and
achieve sustainable development.
D'Arcy
Davis Case, 1990.The community's toolbox: the idea, methods and tools for participatory
assessment, monitoring and evaluation in community forestry. Community
Forestry Field Manual 2, Forests, Trees and People Programme and Network (FTP /
FTPP), FAO / SLU, Italy.
Language:
English/French/Spanish. The Spanish edition (2001) is not available online. The
English manual can be found at:
http://www.fao.org/docrep/x5307e/x5307e00.htm
The
French manual can be found on:
http://www.fao.org/docrep/U5810F/U5810F00.htm
The
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) was founded to
raise levels of nutrition and standards of living, to improve agricultural
productivity, and to better the condition of rural populations. Today, FAO is
one of the largest specialized agencies in the United Nations system and the
lead agency for agriculture, forestry, fisheries and rural development. Since
its inception, FAO has worked to alleviate poverty and hunger by promoting
agricultural development, improved nutrition and the pursuit of food security -
defined as the access of all people at all times to the food they need for an
active and healthy life- while conserving and managing natural resources.
Wilde,
V.L., Vainio-Mattila, A. and B. Brindley (ed.), 1995. Gender
analysis and forestry. International training package. Forestry Department
(FTPP program), FAO, Rome, Italy.
Language: English/ Arabic/ Spanish. English not available online. Arabic versions are available from Near East Foundation's Center for Development Services (CDS) as well as NEF Offices in the Middle East and Sudan.
http://www.neareast.org/main/nefnotes/view.asp?notes_id=342
Spanish
edition has been adapted to a Guatemalan context:
http://www.fao.org/docrep/X5246S/X5246S00.htm
A
useful manual with tools on how to include gender in planning forestry
development projects. Section 1: How to design and implement participatory
training programmes. Section 2: How to design and carry out participatory
training workshops. Section 3: How to use rapid rural appraisal.
Rojas,
M., 1993. Integrating gender considerations into FAO forestry projects.
Forestry Department, FAO, Rome, Italy.
Language:
English/ Spanish. English edition is available online at:
http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/T1855e/T1855e00.htm
Spanish
edition (1994) is available at:
http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/T1855s/T1855s00.htm
This document presents guidelines that help better focus the (FAO) project cycle on local people's concerns. It highlights the ways in which gender-based considerations need to be continually examined and can affect a project.
Donnelly,
J. (ed), 1997. Who Are the Question-makers? A Participatory Evaluation Handbook. OESP
Handbook Series, Office of Evaluation and Strategic Planning (OESP), UNDP, USA.
Language:
English. The handbook is available on the Internet:
http://www.undp.org/eo/documents/who.htm
United
Nations Development Programmes focus on helping countries build and share
solutions to the challenges of: democratic governance, poverty reduction, crisis
prevention and recovery, energy and environment, information and communications
technology and HIV/AIDS. In each of these six practices, UNDP advocates for the
protection of human rights and especially the empowerment of women. The UNDP
also engages in extensive advocacy work.
EuropeAid,
2001 Manual, Project Cycle Management. European Commission and PARTICIP
GmbH, Germany.
EuropeAid,
2002 Training Handbook, Project Cycle Management. European Commission
and PARTICIP GmbH, Germany.
The
training handbook complements the manual. While the manual spells out the PCM
principles, the handbook complements the manual by providing more de-tailed
guidance on how to use the techniques and tools presented.
Language: English/Spanish/French. Available
on the Internet: http://europa.eu.int/comm/europeaid/evaluation/methods/index.htm
EuropeAid Co-operation Office's mission is to implement the external aid instruments of the European Commission, which are funded by the European Community budget and the European Development Fund. The Office is responsible for all phases of the project cycle (identification and appraisal of projects and programmes, preparation of financing decisions, implementation and monitoring, evaluation of projects and programmes).
German,
D., and E Gohl, 1995. Participatory Impact
Monitoring (PIM). GTZ-GATE, Eschborn, Germany.
Language: English, 2 out of 4 booklets are
also available in Spanish (Group based impact monitoring, NGO based impact
monitoring). The manual is
available on the Internet: http://www.gtz.de/participation/english/
The
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH is a (German)
government-owned corporation for international cooperation with worldwide
operations. GTZ’s aim is to improve the living conditions and perspectives of
people in developing and transition countries.
GTZ,
1997.Objectives-oriented project planning
(ZOPP), A Planning Guide for New and Ongoing Projects and Programmes. GTZ,
Germany.
Language:
English. Available on the internet:
http://www.unhabitat.org/cdrom/governance/html/books/zopp_e.pdf
Guijt,
I. And J. Woodhill, 2002. A guide for
project M&E. IFAD, office of Evaluation and Studies, Rome, Italy.
Languages:
English/Spanish. The whole manual can be found on the web:
http://www.ifad.org/evaluation/guide/index.htm
The
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) is a specialized agency
of the United Nations. IFAD was created to mobilize
resources for programmes that alleviate rural poverty and improve nutrition.
ICCO, 2000. Building bridges in PME
Guidelines for good practice in the
planning, monitoring and evaluation of community-based development projects
implemented by southern NGOs with support from European ecumenical agencies.
ICCO, The Netherlands.
Languages: English/French/Spanish/ Portuguese. The whole manual can be found on the web: http://www.icco.nl/delivery/icco/en/doc.phtml?p=publications&action=details&index=6
ICCO's,
Interchurch Organisation for Development Co-operation, work consists in
financing activities which stimulate and enable people, in their own way, to
organise dignified living conditions. ICCO is active in countries in Africa and
the Middle East, in Asia and the Pacific, in Latin America and the Caribbean,
and in Central and Eastern Europe
Kessler,
J.J., 1998. Monitoring of environmental
qualities in relation to development objectives. AIDEnvironment, The
Netherlands.
This
paper serves as a follow-up on the ‘SEAN toolbox’. The objective of this
paper is to provide background information and guidelines to design and
implement monitoring systems with indicators to measure changes in environmental
qualities, as part of the planning cycle, and in relation to development
objectives.
Language:
English. Available at:
http://www.seanplatform.org/products/toolbox/full/Background/totaaldoc.DOC
Language:
Spanish. Available at:
http://www.seanplatform.org/products/toolbox/full/Spanish%20version/Monitoreo_Espanol.doc
Language:
French. Available at:
http://www.seanplatform.org/products/toolbox/full/French%20version/Environmental-monitoring_fr.doc
AidEnvironment
is a not-for-profit consultancy, whose focus is on nature conservation,
sustainable management of natural resources and poverty alleviation.
Margoluis,
R., and N. Salafsky. 1998. Measures of
Success: Designing, Managing, and Monitoring Conservation and Development
Projects. Island Press, Washington D.C.
http://www.fosonline.org/Resources.cfm
Language:
English/Spanish. The Spanish edition is available on the Internet:
http://www.fosonline.org/images/Documents/Medidas/titlepage.htm
Foundations
Of Success (FOS) is a network of individuals and institutions who seek to
improve the practice of conservation.
Nuñez.
M. and R. Wilson-Grau, 2003. Towards a
conceptual framework for evaluating international social change networks.
MandE NEWS (Internet).
Language: English. Available on the Internet:
http://www.mande.co.uk/docs/Towards%20a%20Conceptual%20Framework%20for%20Evaluating%20Networks.pdf
MandE NEWS is a news service focusing on developments in monitoring and evaluation methods relevant to development projects and programmes with social development objectives.
Rubin,
F. 1995. Basic guide to evaluation for development workers. Oxfam UK
and Ireland, UK
Language:
English. The guide is available on the Internet:
http://www.eldis.org/static/DOC6912.htm
Oxfam
International is a confederation of 12 development organizations working
together in more than 100 countries to find lasting solutions to poverty,
suffering and injustice. Oxfam UK and Ireland are members of the Oxfam
International.
SNV
and AID Environment, 1999. The SEAN
Toolbox. SNV Netherlands Development Organisation and AidEnvironment.
Strategic
Environmental Analysis (SEAN) is a methodology that has been developed to
integrate (or 'mainstream') environmental sustainability issues into development
planning to improve its sustainability. SEAN is a comprehensive and practical
tool used in various countries. The potential users of SEAN are planners and
decision makers with a relatively high level of expertise, within governmental
or non-governmental organisations or donor agencies.
Language:
English, Spanish, French. Available
online:
http://www.seanplatform.org/products/toolbox/full/START.htm
Timlin,
A. The annual work planning manual.
VSO Working Paper, UK.
Language: English. Available on the Internet: http://www.workingpapers.vso.org.uk/bus/bus13.pdf
Voluntary
Service Overseas (VSO) is an international development charity that works
through volunteers. Volunteers work in different countries worldwide to share
skills, creativity and learn to build a fairer world. The working paper contains
a planning manual based on the anglo-saxon logframe model.
Only
available in Spanish
FAO. La evaluación en la FAO; cómo
se hace. Internetsite. 1.
Guía para la Organización de una Misión de Evaluación 2.
Metodologías de Diagnóstico Rápido para Evaluar el Impacto
Language :
Spanish. Available on the Internet:
http://www.fao.org/pbe/pbee/sp/how-s.htm
Geilfus F., 1997. 80
Herramientas para el Desarrollo Participativo. IICA/GTZ,
El Salvador.
Language:
Spanish. Available on the website of the Program on Participatory Research and
Gender Analysis (use ‘search’ function):
The
Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA) is a specialized
agency for agriculture and rural well-being of the inter-American system. The
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH is a (German)
government-owned corporation for international cooperation on sustainable
development with worldwide operations. GTZ’s aim is to improve the living
conditions and perspectives of people in developing and transition countries.
The manual supplies a collection of participatory tools for analysis, planning,
monitoring and evaluation.
Organizacion Panamericana de la Salud, 1999. Manual de monitoreo de la ejecución de proyectos. Organizacion
Panamericana de la Salud, World Health Organization.
Language:
Spanish. The manual is available on the internet:
http://www.paho.org/Spanish/DEC/Manual_de_Monitoreo.pdf
The
World Health Organization is the United Nations specialized agency for health.
WHO's objective is the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level
of health.
World
Bank, 2002. Seguimiento y evaluación: instrumentos, métodos y enfoques. World
Bank, USA.
Language:
Spanish. Available on the Internet:
http://bancomundial.org.mx/pdf/Seguimiento_y_evaluacion.pdf
The
"World Bank" is the name that has come to be used for the
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the
International Development Association (IDA). Together these organizations
provide low-interest loans, interest-free credit, and grants to developing
countries.
Not available online
IIRR,
1998. Participatory methods in
community-based coastal resource management. (3 volumes) International
Institute for Rural Reconstruction, Silang, Cavite, the Philippines.
Volume one contains an introduction to community-based coastal management, community organizing and participatory tools. Volume two presents a series of tools. The last volume deals with (P)M&E and provides guidance on assessment and monitoring tools. Language: English. Not available on the Internet.
The
manual can be ordered from IIRR: http://www.iirr.org/publicationbdate.htm
The
part on ‘resource mapping’, part of Volume 2 ‘tools and methods’, can be
downloaded from: http://www.iapad.org/publications/ppgis/resource_mapping.pdf
The
International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (IIRR) is a rural development
organization with its headquarters in the Philippines. Through participatory
approaches, IIRR builds capacities of communities and their organizations,
encourages people-centred practices among other development organizations, and
strengthens linkages between communities and their partners. Their main outputs
are training courses and publications on development issues, and learning from
the work with communities.
Gosling,
L., 2003. Toolkits: A practical guide to monitoring, evaluation and impact
assessment. Save the Children UK.
Language:
English. Not available on the Internet.
Designed to promote a systematic approach to planning,
reviewing and evaluating development work. Covering the whole process of
monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment, it includes a range of practical
tools that can be adapted to suit different circumstances.
Save
the Children is a development organization that fights for children's rights.
They deliver immediate and lasting improvements to children's lives worldwide.
Karl,
M. et al. (ed), 1999. Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Networks.
Women's Feature Service, New Delhi, India.
Language:
English. Not available on the Internet.
http://www.wfsnews.org/book2.html
Women's
Feature Service (WSF) grew out of the Decade for Women to give the voices and
views of women greater access to the world's media. WSF is putting women's
issues into mainstream media in order to inform the public and influence policy
makers.
EvalWeb.
EvalWeb contains: tools and resources to help you with evaluations; contact
information and links to other evaluators and evaluation organizations; lists
and links to recent and upcoming evaluations; and an online community where
practitioners and others can exchange ideas and resources. By: USAID, Center for
Development Information and Evaluation.
http://www.dec.org/partners/evalweb/
USAID is an independent US federal government agency to extend assistance to countries recovering from disaster, trying to escape poverty, and engaging in democratic reforms. Their work supports long-term and equitable economic growth and advances U.S. foreign policy objectives by supporting: economic growth, agriculture and trade; global health; and, democracy, conflict prevention and humanitarian assistance.
GDRC
(Global Development Research Center)
Environmental management tools (Including: Environmental
assessments, monitoring, evaluations)
http://www.gdrc.org/uem/e-mgmt.html
The Global Development Research Center is a virtual organization that carries out initiatives in education, research and practices, in the spheres of environment, urban, community and information, and at scales that are effective.
IDRC
http://web.idrc.ca/ev_en.php?ID=3265_201&ID2=DO_TOPIC
This page provides a brief, annotated list of selected participatory M&E training manuals and toolkits that may be of interest to CBNRM researchers.
MandE
NEWS
A news service focusing on developments in monitoring and
evaluation methods relevant to development projects and programmes with social
development objectives.
http://www.mande.co.uk/specialist.htm
NGO
Manager
NGO Manager Newsletter, November 2002 (http://www.ngomanager.org/newsletter1.htm). Their aim is to provide NGO managers with practical knowledge and tools to help managing an NGO. The newsletter is free, published by the members of the independent non-profit association NGO Management Group, which is based in Geneva, Switzerland. More information can be found at: http://www.ngomanager.org
Sean
platform
The
SEAN Platform was developed by AID Environment and SNV in The Netherlands. Strategic Environmental Analysis (SEAN) is a
methodology for environmental or integrated sustainability analysis. The
following can be found on the website: documents on SEAN, a newsletter, and a
toolbox.
Ó Both ENDS March 2004 (lh)